When a cement truck turns over and pollutes a stream, how is that insured’s exposure addressed? If a freight hauler is unloading drums of soap and one of those drums turns over and spills into a storm drain, how will the insured be protected? In the environmental marketplace, carriers will offer transportation pollution liability ("TPL") coverage to address these exposures.
Transportation pollution liability provides protection for products or materials transported, shipped, or delivered by the insured or by a carrier on the insured’s behalf. Environmental carriers typically offer this enhancement on risks with transportation exposure and some carriers will also specifically include loading and unloading. While unendorsed contractor’s pollution liability ("CPL") policies may include coverage for vehicle use at a jobsite, they typically offer little or no coverage for transportation exposures away from a jobsite. TPL would be available to address this exposure. Additionally, TPL is available for site-specific risks with transportation exposures including manufacturers, freight forwards, and distribution centers. This enhancement can be endorsed onto site pollution to address their exposure.
While capabilities vary from carrier to carrier, most insurance companies offer coverage on a blanket or scheduled basis with occurrence and claims-made triggers available. Typically, minimum premiums start around $2,500 with $15M in limits available. Submission requirements include environmental supplemental application, motor vehicle reports, loss runs (CPL and/or auto), and schedule of vehicles.
The insured, a waterproofing contractor, was traveling to a jobsite in a tanker containing liquid waterproofing material to be used at the job. The vehicle became involved in a collision, and 100 gallons of the product were released onto the road. Both the insured’s vehicle and a third-party vehicle sustained damage. Additionally, the spill was immediately reported to the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and was remediated.
In another situation, the insured was in the business of collecting and disposing of used motor oil from auto repair shops and other vendors. After several pickups and in the course of traveling on a thruway, the truck hit a slick area on the road and overturned, totaling the vehicle and spilling 500 gallons of used motor oil onto the road and into a stream that abutted a residential area. The spill was reported to the DEP, an emergency response team cleaned the road, and the insured was responsible for investigation of soil and water impact, significant remediation, and future monitoring costs. Since the location was a remote area, far from a city, remediation efforts were significant ($700,000).
The insureds in both of these claims carried business auto (“auto”) coverage, commercial general liability (“CGL”) coverage, and contractor’s pollution liability (“CPL”) coverage with a transportation pollution liability (“TPL”) coverage endorsement. The auto carrier covered losses to the first- and third-party vehicles and bodily injury. However, the auto policy’s “pollution” exclusion precluded coverage of loss arising out of the escape of pollution being hauled by a vehicle. The CGL coverage was precluded by the “auto” and “pollution” exclusions. As to the CPL coverage, although this coverage protects the insured against certain pollution losses, it typically does not cover damages arising from a release of pollutants from a vehicle beyond the boundaries of the jobsite. In the above situations, the CPL coverage “vehicles” exclusion precluded coverage for the property damage arising from the use of the vehicle outside the boundaries of the worksite, and absent the TPL coverage endorsement, the “transported materials” exclusion would have precluded property damage arising from products transported to a location beyond the boundaries of a jobsite. Fortunately for these insureds, however, they were covered by the TPL coverage endorsement, which specifically gave back coverage in these instances for property damage arising from a pollutant in the course of being transported by a covered vehicle beyond the boundaries of the jobsite.
Disclaimer: The facts and circumstances giving rise to potential coverage and the determination of whether coverage existed in these instances above are intended for instructional purposes only. Be sure to consult actual CPL coverages and exclusions and associated TPL coverage endorsements to determine whether coverage would exist in particular circumstances.
This article was authored by Cody Barden, an underwriter with Markel Corporation.
Legal Disclaimer. Views expressed here do not constitute legal advice. The information contained herein is for general guidance of matter only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. Discussion of insurance policy language is descriptive only. Every policy has different policy language. Coverage afforded under any insurance policy issued is subject to individual policy terms and conditions. Please refer to your policy for the actual language.
(c) 2017 AmWINS Group, Inc.
Construction contract negotiations, which determine the kind and amount of insurance required for a construction project, can be time-consuming, complicated and frustrating. Project owners require contractors on a project to name the project owner as an additional insured on the contractor’s casualty insurance program. It's important that both project owners and contractors understand the coverage provided by these additional insured endorsements. This article discusses four common ISO additional insured endorsements related to commercial general liability policies purchased by contractors, including their limitations, conditions and exclusions.
A common complication during the claim process is the late reporting of claims. In some cases, a late claim can put the agent or broker's own E&O policy in jeopardy. There are many reasons for missing a reporting deadline; however, in most cases, they will not matter to the insurer or the courts. This article discusses typical claim reporting requirements, common causes of late reporting, and recommendations to mitigate the risk of late notice claim denials.
The theories of recovery, as well as the ensuing loss provisions, contained in property insurance policies are often complex and, at times, seemingly in conflict. Although a policy may not directly address these theories, their application by courts plays a significant role in the coverage determination process after the claim. It is essential that brokers understand the primary theories of recovery – Efficient Proximate Cause, the Concurrent Causation Doctrine, and the Anti-Concurrent Causation Doctrine – in order to navigate the challenging post-claim process and effectively serve their clients.
The Thomas Fire, the largest fire in California's history, subsequently led to a mudslide on January 9, 2018, which caused a massive amount of damage in Santa Barbara and Ventura counties. The California Insurance Commissioner has issued a formal notice reminding carriers to pay for damage, citing the "efficient proximate cause doctrine." This article takes a closer look at the doctrine and how it has been challenged in court over the years.
Ordinance or Law insurance coverage provides limited protection for costs associated with repairing, rebuilding, or constructing a structure when physical damage to the structure by a covered cause of loss triggers an ordinance or law. Compliance with ordinances and laws after a loss can add 50% or more to the cost of a claim. This article will help you educate your insureds on exclusions and limitations and help them take a proactive approach to their insurance program.
In 2017, the issue of sexual harassment – especially in the workplace – gained greater awareness as accusations of harassment by high-profile individuals were constantly in the news. In many cases, sexual harassment lawsuits seriously impacted businesses and their respective insurers. Employment Practices Liability Insurance not only provides protection against employee lawsuits, but can also help your clients mitigate their sexual harassment risks.