As we head into the second quarter of 2019, it has become clear that the pace of market change is accelerating. Buyers and brokers alike will see the differences in rates, limits, terms, and conditions across many classes of casualty coverage.
Loss development on casualty lines has been deteriorating, driving even greater market hardening than was projected. Not only have segments such as New York construction, real estate, and transportation firmed, but that firming is spreading into nearly all sectors of the casualty space.
“There is a significant restriction on capacity, particularly in problem areas,” says Tom Dillon, executive vice president and national casualty practice leader for AmWINS. As noted, New York construction and excess transportation are problem areas, with several carriers dropping out of these markets in the past six months and the remaining carriers doing significant retrenching.
“The supply of capacity is stressed; however, demand continues,” says Matt Jarrett, Director, U.S. Casualty at THB, AmWINS’ London broker. “Carriers are increasing their attachment points, and we’ve also seen rates on line approaching 100% on certain risks.”
On the West Coast, wildfires have not only caused billions of dollars in property damage, but also have wreaked havoc on the casualty market for the major utility companies. “Utilities on the West Coast right now is the hardest of hard markets. It is very difficult to place that business at this point. However, we have found pockets of capacity at the right price,” Jarrett says.
Even outside those problem areas, brokers and buyers can expect to see that – after chasing premium for years – carriers are shifting to a focus on underwriting profitability. Capacity is also constricting in excess liability, with major players that previously had been willing to offer $50 to $100 million limits pulling back to $25 or even $10 million limits on individual accounts
“Those types of actions cut into marketplace capacity quickly, and we expect to utilize more carriers to fill out excess towers,” says Dillion.
Going into Q2, we expect to see the following in casualty market segments:
In Real Estate, habitational business remains problematic. Both primary and excess markets continue to increase pricing and pull back on underwriting of apartments, with lessors risk the more competitive segment.
In Automobile Liability, coming off another year of underwriting losses, we expect to see continued increases in rates and market constriction, especially in the excess space. Most carriers in this space are rerating this class, reducing their limit offering, raising their attachment point or exiting the class entirely.
Product Liability remains a space where underwriters are willing to be aggressive, but there is a caveat. “We are seeing some product liability accounts coming back into the E&S space and carriers asking for more renewal rate,” says Jarrett. “The message is that the space is trending toward hardening, although it’s still not there yet.”
Environmental is still competitive on CPL, small site business, and pollution/professional, thanks to new markets that have entered in recent years. The one exception seems to be New York exposures.
Public Entity is seeing stable market participation, despite heightened underwriting concern around several issues, including wildfires, CTE, and abuse/molestation claims.
The Sharing Economy remains dynamic yet challenging. “Many standard-lines companies claim to write sharing-economy businesses, but often lack the experience to do so. The E&S market is a key resource for brokers and buyers in this space,” says Dillon.
Despite the challenges, retailers can capitalize on the 2019 casualty market. “Even though underwriters are retrenching, they still want and need to write business,” says Jarrett. “The difference is that they are looking for improved terms on the business at rates where they feel will be profitable.”
“This is the time for brokers to show their expertise,” adds Dillon. “It’s not just about saving money any more – it’s about creating value for the client and solving problems.”
Now more than ever, it’s important that retailers work with a wholesaler that can help navigate the market. “Nobody wants to deliver bad news to a client,” says Dillon. “At AmWINS, we have the established relationships and expertise to help retailers create and deliver effective insurance solutions.”
Legal Disclaimer. Views expressed here do not constitute legal advice. The information contained herein is for general guidance of matter only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. Discussion of insurance policy language is descriptive only. Every policy has different policy language. Coverage afforded under any insurance policy issued is subject to individual policy terms and conditions. Please refer to your policy for the actual language.
(c) 2017 AmWINS Group, Inc.
Construction contract negotiations, which determine the kind and amount of insurance required for a construction project, can be time-consuming, complicated and frustrating. Project owners require contractors on a project to name the project owner as an additional insured on the contractor’s casualty insurance program. It's important that both project owners and contractors understand the coverage provided by these additional insured endorsements. This article discusses four common ISO additional insured endorsements related to commercial general liability policies purchased by contractors, including their limitations, conditions and exclusions.
A common complication during the claim process is the late reporting of claims. In some cases, a late claim can put the agent or broker's own E&O policy in jeopardy. There are many reasons for missing a reporting deadline; however, in most cases, they will not matter to the insurer or the courts. This article discusses typical claim reporting requirements, common causes of late reporting, and recommendations to mitigate the risk of late notice claim denials.
The theories of recovery, as well as the ensuing loss provisions, contained in property insurance policies are often complex and, at times, seemingly in conflict. Although a policy may not directly address these theories, their application by courts plays a significant role in the coverage determination process after the claim. It is essential that brokers understand the primary theories of recovery – Efficient Proximate Cause, the Concurrent Causation Doctrine, and the Anti-Concurrent Causation Doctrine – in order to navigate the challenging post-claim process and effectively serve their clients.
The Thomas Fire, the largest fire in California's history, subsequently led to a mudslide on January 9, 2018, which caused a massive amount of damage in Santa Barbara and Ventura counties. The California Insurance Commissioner has issued a formal notice reminding carriers to pay for damage, citing the "efficient proximate cause doctrine." This article takes a closer look at the doctrine and how it has been challenged in court over the years.
Ordinance or Law insurance coverage provides limited protection for costs associated with repairing, rebuilding, or constructing a structure when physical damage to the structure by a covered cause of loss triggers an ordinance or law. Compliance with ordinances and laws after a loss can add 50% or more to the cost of a claim. This article will help you educate your insureds on exclusions and limitations and help them take a proactive approach to their insurance program.
In 2017, the issue of sexual harassment – especially in the workplace – gained greater awareness as accusations of harassment by high-profile individuals were constantly in the news. In many cases, sexual harassment lawsuits seriously impacted businesses and their respective insurers. Employment Practices Liability Insurance not only provides protection against employee lawsuits, but can also help your clients mitigate their sexual harassment risks.