Inside Tips on Navigating the Lloyd’s Claims Process

01/28/2020

Inside Tips on Navigating the Lloyd’s Claims Process

A common misconception is that Lloyd’s of London (Lloyd’s) is a single insurance company. However, Lloyd’s is the name of the corporate “umbrella” under which the various syndicates working within the organization operate. These syndicates are, in effect, individual insurers that all carry the security rating of the Lloyd’s name – S&P “A+ Strong”, Fitch “A+ Strong”, and A.M. Best “A Excellent”.  

THB Group, AmWINS’ London broker, is one of the largest independent Lloyd’s broking operations, placing 11% of all Lloyd’s U.S. premium. THB handles over $1 billion in claim payments through their award-winning claims team. In this article, THB’s Director of Claims, Iain Lebbell, shares his insight on how to navigate the complex claims process at Lloyd’s and what the future holds. 

Placing Risks Through Lloyd’s and its Syndicates 

When placing a risk through Lloyd’s, the broker can use one or multiple syndicates, depending on the requirements of the business. The first syndicate to agree to write a risk is referred to as the “lead” syndicate. When there is more than one syndicate participating on a risk, it is called a “subscription market,” as the syndicates together subscribe to the contract document, or “slip.” This slip historically contained all the coverage and contract conditions relating to the risk, as well as deductibles, premiums, and other related information about the policy.  

The policy wording is also included within the slip, which is the first document the claims department reaches for when advised of a new loss.  The exception to this, which is particularly relevant on larger open market risks, is when the London policy is written on a co-insurance basis, following the form (but not the settlements) of a domestic carrier. 

The Role of the Broker in the Claims Process

United States-based business is predominantly placed into Lloyd’s one of two ways: 1) traditional open market brokerage placed on a direct and facultative basis, or 2) via a third-party binder written through a Coverholder or MGA. When handling a claim, the broker’s role differs slightly depending on which of the two methods is used to place the risk. 

For claims on accounts placed via the open market, London brokers, in addition to any retail agent or wholesale broker, act as an agent of the insured and assist the insured in achieving the best and most efficient settlement of their claim. Unlike in the United States, where the loss adjusters’ and other experts’ reports are sent directly to the carrier, in London, they are sent first to the London broker, who provides them to the carrier(s). As a result, the broker is able to both advocate on behalf of the insured and proactively avoid potential disputes before a reservation of rights or denial letter is sent. 

For Coverholder/MGA business, the London broker acts as an intermediary who brings underwriters and the Coverholder together and, as such, is not an agent of the insured. The claims that arise from these binding authorities are typically handled by a third-party administrator (TPA). The TPA and underwriters have a separate contractual arrangement and the contract will, among other things, grant the TPA authority to settle claims falling within certain parameters.  Examples of these parameters include being able to settle claims up to a certain financial threshold and that are not subject to any coverage concerns or litigation.  Claims that fall outside any defined parameters must be referred to underwriters for direction.  

Any covered claims are then paid from a loss fund held by the TPA, which has been provided in advance by the underwriters. The loss fund is then reimbursed via collection of a monthly claims bordereau produced by the TPA and (currently) processed by the London broker. 

This TPA arrangement can improve the claims payment cycle by weeks for smaller routine claims and is also a benefit to the MGAs who utilize the information gathered by TPAs to improve the performance of the business being written through the binding authority. 

Catastrophic Claims

Like in the United States, the London market is at its most hectic after a catastrophic event. However, preparation takes place months in advance, as carriers now need to have a plan as to how they will cope in the event a catastrophe occurs. 

Using Atlantic storms as an example, as soon as a storm approaches the U.S. coast, carriers will expect information concerning their potential exposure either on a per risk-basis or across their entire book.  Sophisticated Coverholders can utilize their modelling tools to help with this analysis.   
 
There is naturally a significant, if not huge, spike in claims activity following a catastrophic event.  First notifications of losses (FNOL), particularly on the open market business, will flood in to London (pun intended) and need to be shared promptly with the carriers.   

After the initial rush of notifying the markets, there is often a brief lull before the loss adjusters’ reports start to come in. THB uses this time to establish increased settlement authorities for TPAs, collect larger loss funds, and discuss a claims handling strategy with the carrier. 

While the increased workload often levels off a few months after an event, the effects can be felt for much longer.  A major catastrophe tends to attract public adjusters who work to make sure their insured is fully indemnified.  Plaintiffs’ attorneys are also active and will look to correct any potential shortfall an insured may suffer.  Often, a claim that was believed to have been closed is reopened with a lawsuit a year or two later, resulting in a tail on these claims that could go on for a number of years. The most recent and significant example of this is the “loss creep” from Hurricane Irma, which since 2017 would stand as the 10th most costly hurricane of all time.

Finally, carriers are subject to much more scrutiny these days concerning their claims handling following catastrophes and are required to provide a large amount of claims data to various regulatory bodies.  This requirement creates downward pressure on the London broker and especially any TPA to whom claims authority has been delegated. 

The Claims Process 

The process of advising underwriters of a loss is long and complicated, but the following is a concise and simplified summary of what occurs: 

  • Upon receipt of a claim, the London broker will perform multiple checks, and if all is OK, assign a Unique Claims Reference (UCR) and create an Electronic Claims File (ECF) which, as the name suggests, can be submitted to underwriters electronically.  However, less commonly, a paper claims file can be created, which must be physically presented to underwriters. 
  • Underwriters will review the file in either format and add comments or questions as necessary. The London broker will then forward the file to the agent, adjuster, and anyone else, as required. 
  • Any subsequent reports are referred to the market in a similar fashion until all coverage questions have been answered and the claim is ready to be resolved. 
  • When payment is due to be collected from underwriters, an electronic collection request is made via ECF to the relevant agreement parties.
  • Once all parties have approved the payment collection request, the claim is processed through Lloyd’s central accounting system and the money is deposited into the London broker’s account for subsequent transmission to the insured. 

 

Recent and Future London Market Initiatives 

Lloyd’s has recently unveiled its “Future of Lloyd’s” blueprint document, which includes its vision of the future of claims. The outline aims to establish Lloyd’s as the industry leader in the handling and settlement of claims through the following measures: 

  • Reducing the time taken to triage, assess and pay claims using new artificial intelligence and automation technology.  In certain cases, this will allow for straight through processing of non-complex claims with no human intervention.
  • Increasing the use of drone technology, satellite imagery and data from the Internet of Things.
  • Improving accessibility and transparency for (and greater communication between) all stakeholders in the claim.
  • Increasing the speed of payment and processing by enhancing accounting, payment and settlement services.
  • Establishing claims within the market on par with underwriting, based on the concept that claims should no longer be viewed as a “back office” activity, with the competence of practitioners pushed to the forefront.
  • Utilizing the Single Claims Agreement Process (SCAP), which allows a single agreement party, regardless of whether it is a Lloyd’s underwriter or another carrier, to agree a claim.  This step can assist in expediting claims agreement times.
  • While some binding authority programs are written on multiple contracts, each with its own lead underwriter, THB has been instrumental in pioneering the Co-Lead Claims Agreement (CLCA), which allows for one or two of these leads to act as an agreement party. As a result,  turn-around times on binder claims referred to London can be dramatically improved. 

 

Conclusion 

While Lloyd’s is adapting its ways and means of transacting claims, the process has essentially remained unchanged for years. The London broker is, and will likely remain, the conduit for all claims into the Lloyd’s and London markets. In an increasingly electronic world governed by workflow tools, the value added by the claims department by maintaining and nurturing the personal relationships brokers have with underwriters is more important than ever. The power of interacting face-to-face in order to resolve very difficult claim issues is something that technology cannot do; as a result, a knowledgeable and experienced claims department plays a crucial role in ensuring that brokers achieve optimal results for their clients in the most timely manner. 


About the Author  


Iain Lebbell, Director of Claims at THB Group, authored this article.  

THB Group is a specialist international (re)insurance broking and risk management firm, with more than 700 employees around the world. Headquartered in London, THB operates of the largest and most successful Lloyd's broking operations in the specialty market sector. Through its global platform of owned offices, network partnerships and local expertise, THB has clients, markets and spheres of interest on every continent. As part of AmWINS Group, Inc., the largest independent wholesale distributor of specialty insurance products in the United States, THB has the commercial and intellectual resources required to meet the most exacting demands of clients around the world. 

Contact Us

To learn more about how AmWINS can help you place coverage for your clients, reach out to your local AmWINS broker.  If you do not have a contact at AmWINS, please click here.

Legal Disclaimer. Views expressed here do not constitute legal advice. The information contained herein is for general guidance of matter only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. Discussion of insurance policy language is descriptive only. Every policy has different policy language. Coverage afforded under any insurance policy issued is subject to individual policy terms and conditions. Please refer to your policy for the actual language.

(c) 2017 AmWINS Group, Inc.

Most Popular Insights

From Seed to Sale: The Top 5 Issues Impacting the Cannabis Insurance Industry

09/19/19

​Over the last few years, the legal cannabis industry has seen rapid growth and had a significant impact on the U.S. economy. With states continuing to legalize its use, insurance needs for cannabis-related businesses are becoming a popular topic of discussion. This article examines the evolving cannabis industry by exploring five key issues impacting coverage.

Four Key Additional Insured Endorsements for Contractors

Construction contract negotiations, which determine the kind and amount of insurance required for a construction project, can be time-consuming, complicated and frustrating. Project owners require contractors on a project to name the project owner as an additional insured on the contractor’s casualty insurance program. It's important that both project owners and contractors understand the coverage provided by these additional insured endorsements. This article discusses four common ISO additional insured endorsements related to commercial general liability policies purchased by contractors, including their limitations, conditions and exclusions.

Claims Reporting: Better Late than Never?

A common complication during the claim process is the late reporting of claims. In some cases, a late claim can put the agent or broker's own E&O policy in jeopardy. There are many reasons for missing a reporting deadline; however, in most cases, they will not matter to the insurer or the courts. This article discusses typical claim reporting requirements, common causes of late reporting, and recommendations to mitigate the risk of late notice claim denials.

Understanding Property Theories of Recovery and Ensuing Loss Clauses

​The theories of recovery, as well as the ensuing loss provisions, contained in property insurance policies are often complex and, at times, seemingly in conflict. Although a policy may not directly address these theories, their application by courts plays a significant role in the coverage determination process after the claim. It is essential that brokers understand the primary theories of recovery – Efficient Proximate Cause, the Concurrent Causation Doctrine, and the Anti-Concurrent Causation Doctrine – in order to navigate the challenging post-claim process and effectively serve their clients.

Ordinance or Law Insurance Coverage

Ordinance or Law insurance coverage provides limited protection for costs associated with repairing, rebuilding, or constructing a structure when physical damage to the structure by a covered cause of loss triggers an ordinance or law. Compliance with ordinances and laws after a loss can add 50% or more to the cost of a claim. This article will help you educate your insureds on exclusions and limitations and help them take a proactive approach to their insurance program.

Employment Practices Liability in the Age of #MeToo

In 2017, the issue of sexual harassment – especially in the workplace – gained greater awareness as accusations of harassment by high-profile individuals were constantly in the news. In many cases, sexual harassment lawsuits seriously impacted businesses and their respective insurers. Employment Practices Liability Insurance not only provides protection against employee lawsuits, but can also help your clients mitigate their sexual harassment risks.

Sign Up For Our Monthly Newsletter

Sign Up