Underground Storage Tank


The New EPA Underground Storage Tank Regulations: A Compliance Primer


Underground storage tanks (“USTs”) have long been used in a wide variety of residential, commercial, and industrial applications. UST regulations are intended to safeguard public health and safety, as well as reduce the economic impacts of a UST system failure. Most obviously, leaks in UST systems have the potential to contaminate the natural environment, and groundwater in particular, which is a significant source of drinking water.1  Additionally, UST regulations are designed to prevent damage, injury or death by combustion of stored material.

Congress began legislating the regulation of UST systems in 1984, and has since developed increasingly more comprehensive and robust regulations, with the most recent iteration established in 2015. These developments represent responses to advances in preventative technology, including leak detection and secondary containment, as well as changes in the substances being stored in UST systems. Further, congressional action on UST systems has been underscored by the goal of creating a more uniform set of regulations among state and local governments, as well as on tribal lands.2

Nothing in the federal UST system regulations precludes a state from adopting more stringent regulations.3  States also have the option to submit their own UST regulation program to the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) for approval as an alternative to the federal UST system regulations.4  The EPA has granted state program approval to 38 states (as well as Puerto Rico and the District of Columbia) who have exercised this option.5  UST operators in the remaining 12 states (and in Guam, Samoa, and the Northern Mariana Islands) must comply with both state and federal EPA regulations.6  The term “implementing agency” is defined as either the EPA or. in context of State Program Approval, the state or local agency responsible for carrying out the approved UST program.7

A UST is defined as a tank, including peripheral piping, used to contain regulated substances, and whose volume is more than 10 percent underground.8  The term “regulated substance” is intended to include petroleum and a host of other substances deemed hazardous by the EPA.9  The federal regulations governing UST systems are generally codified in the Solid Waste Disposal Act and Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations.10  By these regulations, Congress has granted the EPA express authority to regulate UST systems. The purpose of this article is to discuss developments set forth in the most recent UST regulations, which became effective on October 13, 2015 and which provide a three-year window to achieve compliance.

The 2015 UST system regulations included the following notable developments: (1) added secondary containment requirements; (2) added operating training requirements; and (3) added UST system compatibility requirements for alternative fuels. 

Secondary Containment

Secondary containment describes a second layer of containment around both the UST and its piping, with a space between the primary containment layer and the secondary one.  This space between the two containment layers is referred to as interstitial, and is designed to house a leak detection system.  A sump or depression at the bottom of the secondary containment layer is constructed to hold any leaking material as well as the leak detection system, which is triggered when leaked material makes its way to the sump.

As of April 11, 2016, the Solid Waste Disposal Act requires UST operators to install both a secondary containment system and an interstitial leak detection system when installing or replacing USTs and piping.11  This new requirement reflects technological advances which make the use of these systems economically viable and therefore a baseline for UST system safety.


Operator Training

UST system regulations establish three classes of UST operators: ‘A,’ ‘B,’ and ‘C.’12  Each operator class has training and examination requirements commensurate with the respective responsibilities of each class.  Generally, Class A Operators are the individuals primarily responsible for operating and maintaining the UST system; Class B Operators are those responsible for the day-to-day implementation of the UST regulations; and Class C Operators are those responsible for the immediate response to a problem at a UST facility.

Class A operators are expected to be familiar with the basic requirements of operating a UST, including spill and overfill prevention, release detection, corrosion protection, product compatibility, reporting/record keeping, and testing/inspection.13  Class B operators are required to be familiar with class ‘A’ requirements as well as emergency response procedures.14  Class C operators are required to be familiar only with emergency response procedures and proper notification protocol to authorities in the event of a leak.  

UST operators are required to complete their training requirements by October 13, 2018. Class ‘A’ and class ‘B’ UST operators assuming duties after this date are required to complete operator training requirements within 30 days, while Class ‘C’ UST operators must complete training prior to assuming duties.16  Class ‘A’ and class ‘B’ operators are required to submit to annual refresher training, while class ‘C’ operators are not subject to this requirement.17


Operation and Maintenance 


Beginning on October 13, 2018, UST systems are subject to new operation and maintenance requirements, which focus on thorough operation, inspection and testing practices.

As a preliminary matter, general operating requirements for UST systems require the use of spill and overflow prevention methods and leak detection equipment.18 Additionally, there are stringent performance standards for UST system tanks and piping.19

After October 13, 2018, UST operators must perform walkthrough inspections of UST systems according to one of three sets of guidelines: (1) those guidelines established by federal UST regulations; (2) those guidelines established by a standard code of practice developed by a nationally recognized association or independent testing laboratory; or (3) those guidelines developed by a UST operator’s local implementing agency.20  The second option defers inspection parameters to guidelines established by industry organizations such as the American Petroleum Institute, American Society for Testing and Materials, and the National Fire Protection Association, among others.21

 According to the federal UST system regulations, UST operators must inspect spill prevention equipment and release detection equipment every 30 days, or less frequently if a UST system is receiving deliveries at intervals greater than 30 days.22  Containment sumps and hand-held release detection equipment must be inspected annually according to the federal UST regulations.23  These regulations also require inspection of overfill prevention equipment every three years.24

The federal UST system regulations also mandate regular testing of various components. Spill prevention and containment sump equipment (used for interstitial monitoring between the primary and secondary layers of the tank or piping) must be tested every three years to ensure the equipment is liquid tight by either vacuum, pressure, or liquid testing methods.25  These methods may be based on manufacturer testing requirements (if applicable), a code of practice developed by a nationally recognized association or independent testing laboratory, or the UST system operator’s local implement agency.26  Similarly, the electronic and mechanical components of release detection equipment must be tested annually based by the same methods.27

System Compatibility  


Due to increasing demand for alternative fuels, the EPA has developed regulations to ensure that these fuels are chemically compatible with UST systems.  Effective October 13, 2015, UST system operators are required to notify their implementing agency at least 30 days in advance of switching to a regulated substance containing greater than 10 percent ethanol or greater than 20 percent biodiesel (or any other substance regulated by the implementing agency).28  Additionally, these UST system operators must demonstrate compatibility either by written approval from the equipment manufacturer or by certification from a nationally recognized, independent testing laboratory.29  Alternatively, another option determined by the implementing agency to be no less protective of human health and the environment than the two compatibility demonstration options listed above may be used.


Conclusion & Further Information


The most recent 2015 federal UST system regulations represent an overhaul of many important aspects of UST operation.  Requirements relating to secondary containment, interstitial leak detection, operator training, and compatibility between UST systems and their contents, are all designed to minimize the risk of groundwater contamination as well as the combustion of stored materials.  It is important to note that – under the 2015 state program approval (SPA) regulations – the 38 states (plus the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico) which currently have SPA must reapply by October 13, 2018 in order to retain their SPA status.  The remaining 16 non-SPA states and territories may apply for SPA at any time. We encourage readers to learn more by visiting the EPA’s website, which is replete with resources relevant to compliance assistance, emergency response and remediation protocol, and unique considerations for airport hydrant systems and field-constructed UST systems.30 


Richard Glucksman is a partner of Chapman Glucksman Dean Roeb & Barger which has offices throughout California. Mr. Glucksman is an AV Preeminent Rated Lawyer with Martindale-Hubbell, which is the highest rating available. He has been named "Super Lawyer" for the last 10 years, including 2017. He is well known in the business and construction legal community for his representation of businesses, builders, and developers. Mr. Glucksman specializes in complex multi-party litigation, including construction law, environmental, commercial, business and catastrophic casualty litigation.

Ravi Mehta is an associate of Chapman Glucksman Dean Roeb & Barger.  He specializes in complex construction litigation, mold litigation, and general liability, including catastrophic torts.  His has developed a premier practice of representing craft builders of museum-quality residential properties for high net worth individuals, and also has deep experience in commercial projects, manufacturing facilities, and churches. Mr. Mehta has authored for leading publications in these and related fields, including the Los Angeles Lawyer, and the Los Angeles Daily Journal.  

1 GROUND WATER PROTECTION COUNCIL, Ground Water & Underground Storage Tanks, in GROUND WATER REPORT TO THE NATION: A CALL TO ACTION 7•1–7•12 (2007), http://www.gwpc.org/sites/default/files/GroundWaterReport-2007-.pdf.
2 42 U.S.C.  § 6991(10)(l) (2012); See 18 U.S.C. § 1151 (2012) (defining “Indian Country.”). 
3 42 U.S.C. §6991(10)(G).
4 42 U.S.C. §6991(10(C). 
5 State Underground Storage Tank (UST) Programs, ENVTL. PROTECTION AGENCY, https://www.epa.gov/ust/state-underground-storage-tank-ust-programs#which (last visited Apr. 4, 2017).
6 In California, for example, UST systems are governed by the State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Quality. See Division of Water Quality—Underground Storage Tank Program, CAL. ENVTL. PROTECTION AGENCY STATE WATER RES. BD., http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/ust/.  UST operators in Indian Country must comply with federal UST system regulations. 
7 40 C.F.R. § 280.12 (2017).
8 42 U.S.C. § 6991(10) (2012).  There are also a variety of limited exceptions to the definition of a UST which are found in 42 U.S.C. § 6991(10)(A)-(I).  These exceptions are generally for the benefit of non-commercial UST system operators. 
9 42 U.S.C. § 6991(7); 42 U.S.C. § 9601(4) (2012).  The broad definition of “regulated substance” includes the scope of those substances regulated by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, the Solid Waste Disposal Act, and the Toxic Substances Control Act, among others.  
10 See 42 U.S.C. §§ 6991, et seq. and 42 U.S.C. §§ 13201, et seq. (2012); see 40 C.F.R. §§ 280.10 (2017), et seq. 
11 40 U.S.C. § 6991b(i)(1). 
12 40 C.F.R. § 280.241 (2017). 
13 40 C.F.R. § 280.242(a) (2017). 
14 40 C.F.R. § 280.242(b). 
15 40 C.F.R. § 280.242(c).
16 40 C.F.R. § 280.243 (2017),
17 40 C.F.R. § 280.244 (2017). 
18 40 C.F.R. § 280.30 (2017); 40 C.F.R. § 280.40 (2017).
19 40 C.F.R. § 280.20 (2017). 
20 40 C.F.R. § 280.36 (2017).
21 State Underground Storage Tank (UST) Programs, ENVTL. PROTECTION AGENCY, https://www.epa.gov/ust/underground-storage-tanks-usts-laws-and-regulations#code 
22 40 C.F.R. § 280.36(a)(1)(i).
23 40 C.F.R. § 280.36(a)(1)(ii).
24 40 C.F.R. § 280.35(a)(2).
25 40 C.F.R. § 280.35(a)(1)(ii).
26 Id. 
27 40 C.F.R. § 280.40(a)(3).
28 40 C.F.R. § 280.32 (2017).
29 Id. 
30 See Underground Storage Tanks (USTs), ENVTL. PROTECTION AGENCY, http://www.epa.gov/ust/ 
Contact Us

To learn more about how AmWINS can help you place coverage for your clients, reach out to your local AmWINS broker.  If you do not have a contact at AmWINS, please click here.

Legal Disclaimer. Views expressed here do not constitute legal advice. The information contained herein is for general guidance of matter only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. Discussion of insurance policy language is descriptive only. Every policy has different policy language. Coverage afforded under any insurance policy issued is subject to individual policy terms and conditions. Please refer to your policy for the actual language.

(c) 2017 AmWINS Group, Inc.

Most Popular Insights

5 Strategies for Successful Small Business Renewals During COVID


In the current economic climate, many small businesses are struggling and some may even fail. Despite these challenges and the continued hardening market, there is opportunity for retailers to write and retain business. This article provides guidance on navigating the complex small business marketplace and helps retailers fine tune their understanding of what insurable risks will look like over the next 12 to 24 months.

What Product Recall Insurance and Risk Mitigation Plan Is Right for Your Clients?


​Product recalls are one of the most damaging events a business may encounter. In order to effectively respond to an incident, companies must be prepared with proper risk management strategies. As policy wording varies, it's also critical to ensure your clients have the right policy type in place to appropriately address their first- and third-party exposures.

State of the Market - Q2 2020


Our Q2 2020 State of the Market report provides a holistic view of highly impacted industry segments as well as overall market trends. This report is designed to help our retailers gain the knowledge they need to retain accounts, write new business, overcome challenges and capitalize on opportunities that do exist.

10 Catastrophe Claim Tips for Severe Weather Season


Severe weather can be unpredictable and strike at any time. Help your clients be prepared in the event their property is damaged by a hurricane, tornado, hailstorm or similar disaster with these 10 catastrophe claim tips.

On-Demand Webinar: COVID-19 Economic Impact and Future Outlook


As a result of the COVID-19 crisis, our industry is facing a broad array of challenges that impact insureds of every size and in every industry. In the first of a series of webinars, we hear from an economist on the financial impacts of COVID-19 and what we can expect in the future. This webinar is intended to complement your conversations with clients about how to plan for the next 12 to 24 months.

Lloyd's CEO and Property Underwriters Share COVID-19 Response and Market Update


This podcast features an update from John Neal, CEO of Lloyd’s, on the state of the Lloyd's market and their response to COVID-19 as well as a panel discussion with London Property underwriters on how they view the pandemic's impact both the Property sector and their syndicate's business.

Lloyd's CEO and Casualty Underwriters Share COVID-19 Response and Market Update


This podcast features an update from John Neal, CEO of Lloyd’s, on the state of the Lloyd's market and their response to COVID-19 as well as a panel discussion with London Casualty underwriters on how they view the pandemic's impact both the Casualty sector and their syndicate's business.

Lloyd's CEO and Professional Underwriters Share COVID-19 Response and Market Update


This podcast features an update from John Neal, CEO of Lloyd’s, on the state of the Lloyd's market and their response to COVID-19 as well as a panel discussion with London Professional Lines underwriters on how they view the pandemic's impact both the Professional Lines sector and their syndicate's business.

Flood 101: What to Know About Standard Flood Insurance


Ninety-eight percent of all United States counties were impacted by a flood event in 2018, yet many property owners remain unaware of their true risk of flood or what their existing policies cover. This article highlights key statistics about flood risk and outlines the differences between the National Flood Insurance Program and private market flood insurance.

Professional Lines Challenges and Market Response During the COVID-19 Crisis


The COVID-19 crisis has created a rapidly changing environment for the Professional Lines market. With the uncertainty of how claims will develop and the potential for increased exposure, retailers must be proactive. In this article, AmWINS specialists share their insights on why this is more important now than ever, including reactionary underwriting trends, D&O policy exclusions and impacts to EPLI, as well as the threat for increased cyber attacks and crime losses.

Small Business and Personal Lines During the COVID Crisis


Loss of revenue caused by stay-at-home orders due to the coronavirus pandemic has affected small businesses and the insurance industry serving them significantly. As retailers and carriers prioritize their focus to adapt to the “new normal” of daily transactions, underlying market dynamics remain unchanged. In this article, our experts share their insight on the current changes that we are seeing the small business and personal lines market, and how to navigate the market a this time of uncertainty.

Mind the Gap: COVID-19's Impact on the Logistics Industry


The disruptive impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on supply chains is already having a pronounced effect on the world of logistics and logistics insurance. Port closures, demand surges and production shifts are requiring nimble response to keep up with change. This article arms insurance brokers with the information needed to understand the changes taking place and plan for what is likely to occur in the months ahead.

Navigating the Casualty Market’s Response to COVID-19


The Casualty market’s response to COVID-19 is continuously evolving. With a wide array of factors already impacting this sector pre-crisis, segments of the Casualty marketplace are responding to the pandemic differently. In this article, our industry specialists share overall themes in the Casualty market and take a closer look at how various segments are being impacted.

Top COVID-19 Issues Impacting Builder’s Risk Insurance


The COVID-19 pandemic is causing historical disruption to the construction industry. These changes mean that risk mitigation strategies need to be implemented or revisited, policy language should be reviewed, and carriers should be apprised of all changes at the work-site. In this article, AmWINS specialists examine the major areas of concern for Builder’s Risk insureds, including government-mandated shutdowns, supply chain-driven slowdowns and policy wording that could limit coverage, and provide guidance for retailers to achieve the best results for their clients.

State of the U.S. Logistics Insurance Market


For decades, the logistics insurance market has been considered a sub-market of the cargo or ocean marine market. However, the continual rise of e-commerce and its effect on the global supply chain has carved out a complex and expansive industry niche. This article provides insight into the various lines of coverage, the specialized underwriting approach, and rate surges within the U.S. logistics insurance market.

Lloyd’s & the London Market’s Response to COVID-19


During the COVID-19 pandemic, Lloyd’s remains open for business and syndicates have successfully transitioned to working from home. However, there are notable changes in how the London market is approaching business. In this article, specialists from THB, AmWINS’ London broker, share their insight on consistent themes across the London Market as well as updates on various lines of business.

COVID-19 Claims Advice


There have been a lot of questions regarding COVID-19, in particular about coverage and claims handling. This claims advice is intended to offer guidance to help our retail clients through these difficult times.

Insurance Impacts of COVID-19 on the Healthcare and Senior Living Industry


As the healthcare industry remains on the front lines of battling the COVID-19 pandemic, staying abreast of the changing landscape and how the insurance market is adapting is critical to ensure new exposures are covered and renewals are successfully placed. In this article, our specialists share what they are seeing in the Healthcare and Senior Care markets, tips for risk control and mitigation, and how to get the best results for insureds.

Statute of Limitations Changes Cast a Shadow on Public Entities


​Public entities are facing a climate of change as the market continues to harden and insureds are faced with double-digit rate increases in property and liability. Contributing to this disruption are statute of limitation changes for sexual abuse victims, which have extended or removed the time limit for which a victim can file a claim. This article examines the impact of increased claim activity and discusses considerations that need to be made to better manage costs during this time of uncertainty.​

COVID-19 – Are Your Clients Covered?


The disruption to business and everyday life caused by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic is resulting in an economic impact for insureds. Much of this disruption is likely not covered by insurance. We have consulted with several AmWINS insurance specialists across the Property, Casualty and Professional Lines sectors and offer a COVID-19 update.

Sign Up For Our Monthly Newsletter

Sign Up