Changes in the alternative capital space and the London marketplace raise the stakes for retailers.
The amount of alternative capital in the global reinsurance industry surpassed $95 billion in 2018 and is on track to reach $100 billion in 2019. Although alternative capital is still less than 20% of the value of traditional reinsurance in the market (approximately $595 billion) however, it is notable that traditional capital growth remained flat during this same time span.
Although ‘alternative capital’ is a broad term, it typically refers to capital from institutional investors (primarily pension funds) that is given to a fund manager in order to assume insurance risk. The objective is to provide investors with “pure” exposure to insurance as an asset class, eliminating the other sources of risk – such as equity market risk and management risk – that exist when investing in (re)insurance companies. This capital is typically invested in financial instruments whose values are driven by insurance loss events and that can be linked to losses, especially property losses caused by natural catastrophes and weather events. They fall under the umbrella of Insurance Linked Securities (ILS) and include collateralized reinsurance, sidecars, aggregate retro products, and catastrophe bonds.
Although alterative capital expansion continues its upward trend into 2019, there is a difference in how investors are allocating their funds in light of two years of significant losses. Hurricane Michael caused up to $10 billion in damage, and the Camp and Woolsey Fires in California combined for $13 billion, making it the second year fires passed the $10 billion mark.
“We are at an inflection point with the ILS market—a stage we haven’t reached previously with investors seeing existing capital tied up beyond year-end. However, we continue to believe that ILS capital will be a long-term sustainable source or capital for our industry,” says Scott Purviance, CEO of AmWINS Group, Inc.
Those capital restrictions come from elevated losses over the past two years, including adverse development from 2017 losses. With current investors unable to release capital allocated to those claims, the question is whether they are willing to commit additional money. However, even if certain investors choose not to re-invest, we believe other existing and new investors can fill that gap.
“Historically, alternative capital was deployed deeper in the value chain. Today, investors are increasingly moving toward collateralized reinsurance, which allows them to develop relationships with MGAs and deploy capital behind more defined pools of risk,” says Ben Sloop, COO of AmWINS.
Two words are shaping the London market as we enter 2019: performance management. Faced with massive losses over the last few years, high structural costs, and new leadership bringing in a different perspective, Lloyd’s is undergoing a focus on performance management that is expected to shrink its 2019 gross written premium by around five percent and, ultimately, generate improvement in underwriting results.
For the retailer, this could create a potential impact as several major syndicates pursue a reduction in capacity. Some syndicates have been left with no choice but to close down some of their loss-producing classes.
“Lloyd's is going to write slightly less and demand more in pricing going into 2019. There will be a pullback going forward on loss-affected accounts,” says Purviance.
But even with all this change and uncertainty, London will continue to provide the backbone for worldwide specialty insurance. “Our expectation is that the Lloyd's market will remain hugely relevant across both its retail and E&S businesses. We are hopeful that after this period of retrenching in 2019, we will see a healthier, more vibrant, and entrepreneurial Lloyd's in 2020 and onwards,” says Toby Colls, Director at THB Group. “Lloyd's is still the number one E&S lines carrier in the world, and we do not expect this to change either in the short or the long term.”
And ultimately, the “short-term pain for long-term gain” strategy should benefit retailers, buyers, and the entire market.
“There will indeed be a change in the structure of many syndicates’ portfolios, and we will seek increased writings in some classes and reduced writings in others. However, we strongly believe this will benefit all of our clients who value their long-standing relationships with their London carriers,” Colls says.
What the changes in both alternative capital and London mean for retailers is that establishing partnerships with experienced wholesalers is more important than ever. In addition to providing connections to alternative capital, AmWINS has access to over 400 colleagues in the London market and other global regions under the THB brand, as well as direct relationships with global markets that can deliver solutions to retailers.
“The marketplace is very complex, so retailers need a wholesaler who can understand the market and be positioned to make use of available capital,” says Sloop. “Particularly as ILS funds move forward in the value chain, we can help access that capital in a more direct and effective fashion.”
Legal Disclaimer. Views expressed here do not constitute legal advice. The information contained herein is for general guidance of matter only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. Discussion of insurance policy language is descriptive only. Every policy has different policy language. Coverage afforded under any insurance policy issued is subject to individual policy terms and conditions. Please refer to your policy for the actual language.
(c) 2017 AmWINS Group, Inc.
Over the last few years, the legal cannabis industry has seen rapid growth and had a significant impact on the U.S. economy. With states continuing to legalize its use, insurance needs for cannabis-related businesses are becoming a popular topic of discussion. This article examines the evolving cannabis industry by exploring five key issues impacting coverage.
Construction contract negotiations, which determine the kind and amount of insurance required for a construction project, can be time-consuming, complicated and frustrating. Project owners require contractors on a project to name the project owner as an additional insured on the contractor’s casualty insurance program. It's important that both project owners and contractors understand the coverage provided by these additional insured endorsements. This article discusses four common ISO additional insured endorsements related to commercial general liability policies purchased by contractors, including their limitations, conditions and exclusions.
A common complication during the claim process is the late reporting of claims. In some cases, a late claim can put the agent or broker's own E&O policy in jeopardy. There are many reasons for missing a reporting deadline; however, in most cases, they will not matter to the insurer or the courts. This article discusses typical claim reporting requirements, common causes of late reporting, and recommendations to mitigate the risk of late notice claim denials.
The theories of recovery, as well as the ensuing loss provisions, contained in property insurance policies are often complex and, at times, seemingly in conflict. Although a policy may not directly address these theories, their application by courts plays a significant role in the coverage determination process after the claim. It is essential that brokers understand the primary theories of recovery – Efficient Proximate Cause, the Concurrent Causation Doctrine, and the Anti-Concurrent Causation Doctrine – in order to navigate the challenging post-claim process and effectively serve their clients.
Ordinance or Law insurance coverage provides limited protection for costs associated with repairing, rebuilding, or constructing a structure when physical damage to the structure by a covered cause of loss triggers an ordinance or law. Compliance with ordinances and laws after a loss can add 50% or more to the cost of a claim. This article will help you educate your insureds on exclusions and limitations and help them take a proactive approach to their insurance program.
In 2017, the issue of sexual harassment – especially in the workplace – gained greater awareness as accusations of harassment by high-profile individuals were constantly in the news. In many cases, sexual harassment lawsuits seriously impacted businesses and their respective insurers. Employment Practices Liability Insurance not only provides protection against employee lawsuits, but can also help your clients mitigate their sexual harassment risks.