Not all superheroes wear capes. With more than 130,000 people in the United States hospitalized from COVID-19 in a single week in January 2021, today’s superheroes wear a stethoscope and PPE. Even in these extraordinary circumstances, our frontline healthcare workers are subject to fair work standards set forth by the U.S. government and healthcare employers are subject to claims and enforcement action.
This article examines how Wage & Hour exposures have been impacted due to COVID-19 and what employers need to know to mitigate their risk of claims.
Before digging into the issues surrounding Wage & Hour (W&H) exposure in the era of the COVID-19, let’s revisit exactly who oversees W&H statute compliance and where these types of claims can come from. W&H enforcement falls within the purview of the Department of Labor, specifically within the Wage & Hour Division (WHD).
WHD’s mission is to promote and achieve compliance with labor standards to protect and enhance the welfare of the nation’s workforce. WHD enforces federal minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor requirements of the Fair Labor Standards Act. WHD also enforces the paid sick leave and expanded family and medical leave requirements of the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA), the Family and Medical Leave Act, wage garnishment provisions of the Consumer Credit Protection Act, and a number of additional statutes, employment standards and worker protections as provided in several immigration related statutes.1
As you can see, the scope of WHD’s oversight spans well beyond the typical meal breaks and overtime pay issues we tend to think about when speaking of Wage & Hour exposure. To take it a step further, oversight of compliance with the provisions of the recently announced FFCRA also fall within the purview of WHD’s oversight.
When considering the potential impact of W&H on the healthcare industry specifically, consideration must be given to the dynamics of this segment throughout the various stages of the pandemic.
First, the media reports of hospitals being overrun with symptomatic patients in need of life-saving care, a trend that only grew more severe as the pandemic spread across the nation. This overrun on capacity strained not only the equipment resources of our healthcare system, but often called for our frontline providers to put in unprecedented hours to provide necessary care to all those in need.
Second, the tremendous pressure put on the pharmaceutical and life sciences industries to not only develop an effective vaccine in what was considered an impossibly short timeframe, but to also continue to manufacture and distribute the necessary personal protective equipment (PPE) required to slow the spread.
In all aspects of this national effort to slow the spread and minimize the impact of the pandemic, many different strains were put on the healthcare industry workforce, including:
The immediate impacts of these strains are obvious as remaining staff in various roles supporting this industry are being asked to do more and work longer hours, potentially pushing the bounds of compliance with basic overtime, meal and rest period requirements for non-exempt employees. What’s more important is to look at the not so obvious derivative impacts that many of these strains can cause.
This can cause frustration and potentially a dynamic where independent contractors question their rights and more importantly the classification their employers had them in. In many circumstances, the IRS guidance on who can be classified as a W2 employee vs. an independent contractor can be rather ambiguous.2, 3 As states begin to audit claims, and independent contractors begin to evaluate their positions, systemic issues could be identified.
Care must also be given to exactly how employers assist impacted W2 employees vs. independent contractors with obtaining unemployment benefits where available. Under FFCRA, many states are making unemployment available to independent contractors or gig workers where they can show documented earnings. Employers can be a great deal of help in this regard,4 or can be a substantial hindrance potentially causing further exposure to claims for negligence in the provision of consistent corporate policies or wrongful supervision.
Law firms are beginning to track COVID-19 litigation. Through the majority of 2020, more than 400 employment-related COVID-19 lawsuits have been filed, with the trend only increasing. The majority of cases have been filed in California, Florida, New Jersey, New York and Texas. The most frequently filed claims involve discrimination, leaves of absence and work-from-home issues. Some states have enacted liability shields to protect employers that act in good faith from coronavirus claims, but the federal government is still debating nationwide legislation, leaving this a substantially nascent issue.6
There is general concern amongst carriers over the rising trend in EPLI litigation and Wage & Hour claims. This trend, coupled with record low interest rates and a decade-long trend of market softening until mid-2019, has put extraordinary pressure on pricing. This pressure will need to continue to address not only historical shortfalls in combined ratios, but new trends like the pandemic and resulting exposures.
Markets are more frequently seeking to limit exposure to layoffs, RIFs and furloughs, either with higher SIRs or with outright exclusionary language applicable to discriminatory practices related to COVID-19. The breadth of this new language is an ongoing issue. As carriers across the market seek to limit coverage, retailers and brokers must constantly evaluate how the new restrictions preclude coverage. In response, they will need to work to soften language or apply retroactive coverage when the new language has the potential to eliminate coverage for wrongful acts or alleged wrongful acts that may have already taken place, but have not yet come to the attention of the insured’s risk management team.
As is typically the case when dealing with the fear of the unknown from a risk management standpoint, the best reactions are built off proactive risk mitigating strategies. The formation of a pandemic compliance committee with collaboration between management, legal and HR is integral in staying abreast of and communicating constant changes in compliance requirements coming from the various regulatory stakeholders referenced.
The importance of training management in how to effectively communicate with their staff and implement various operational tactics cannot be overstated. Having these plans clearly documented, regularly reviewed and clearly communicated in a consistent and regular manner will not only help organizations identify issues or concerns, and correct them proactively, but it will most importantly reinforce an organizations mission of looking out for the wellbeing and preservation of their most valuable asset, their people!
The COVID-19 pandemic has, and continues, to put strain on the healthcare industry, causing new and increased Wage & Hour exposure. It’s important for retailers to understand this evolving exposure to help their insureds develop a risk mitigation strategy and put proper coverage in place should a claim arise.
AmWINS has brokers across the country dedicated to Professional Lines coverages for the Healthcare industry. Our specialists have the expertise and market relationships to help you navigate this, an many other, complex insurance issues.
This article was written by Marc Wagner, Healthcare specialist with AmWINS Brokerage in Philadelphia, PA.
1 U.S. Department of Labor (September 2020). U.S. Department of Labor Revises Regulations to Clarify Paid Leave Requirements Under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act. https://www.dol.gov/newsroom/releases/whd/whd20200911-2
2 Employment Law Worldview (July 2020). DOL Update: COVID-19-Related Guidance and New Opinion Letters (US). https://www.employmentlawworldview.com/dol-update-covid-19-related-guidance-and-new-opinion-letters-us/
3 IRS (July 2017). Understanding Employee vs. Contractor Designation. https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/understanding-employee-vs-contractor-designation
4 National Employment Law Project (March 2020). Independent Contractors and COVID-19: Working Without Protections. https://www.nelp.org/publication/independent-contractors-covid-19-working-without-protections/
5 Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Memorandum of Understanding Between the U.S. Department of Labor Occupational Safety and Health Administration and Employment Standards Administration Wage and Hour Division. https://www.osha.gov/laws-regs/mou/1990-04-05
6 SHRM (August 2020) These Coronavirus-Related Workplace Issues May Lead to Lawsuits. https://www.shrm.org/resourcesandtools/legal-and-compliance/employment-law/pages/these-coronavirus-related-workplace-issues-may-lead-to-lawsuits.aspx