As the P&C market continues to harden, accounts across many sectors of business are seeing double-digit rate increases in property and liability lines, and the public entity sector is no exception. Additionally, public entity accounts are now facing a rise in claims related to new state-level laws changing the statute of limitations and giving childhood sex abuse victims more time to file civil lawsuits.
Since 2002, 80 percent of states have amended their child sexual abuse laws to modify or pause the period of time set forth by a statute of limitations so that a suit may be filed long after it previously had been allowed. For instance, in Florida, if abuse allegedly happened to a victim who was under age 16 at the time, there is no statute of limitations. In California, Assembly Bill 218, passed in October 2019, both extended the statute of limitations and opened a three-year “lookback window” for filing new claims or reopening action on previously time-barred claims. Nationwide, social media has contributed to an increase in abuse claims, adding fuel to an already hot fire by giving broad, instant publicity to allegations.
As some states adopt more liberal laws than others, plaintiffs’ attorneys shop for the most favorable jurisdiction, which also drives up claims costs. Organizations with a multi-state or national reach face the risk of lawsuits both in individual states and at the federal level. These actions lead to potentially dire consequences for public entities, including the much-publicized bankruptcy filing by the Boy Scouts of America in February 2020.
Carriers’ concerns about the rise in lawsuits is reflected in an overall reduction in capacity, declination of insurance to high-risk classes of business, an increase in quota-share offerings, and mandates for higher self-insured retentions. With some jurisdictions providing statutes of limitations as far back as 50 years for abuse claims—or even eliminating them altogether—some insurers are only willing to offer coverage on a claims-made basis. Others are attempting to carve out abuse coverage from the general liability policy, and monoline sexual abuse and molestation coverage is proving increasingly difficult to find. As a result, more and more public entities are resorting to alternative risk financing, captives, JPAs and other arrangements.
Given the rate increases and potential influx of claims, public entities need to consider how their liability program is structured to better anticipate costs. Although self-insured retention plans offer lower up-front pricing, organizations bear a greater burden of risk. And in an era of rising claim frequency and “nuclear” verdicts, such plans may be woefully inadequate to cover claims that are made.
Every public entity’s budget will negatively be impacted going forward, and retailers should look for a product that can guarantee a premium on at least one line of coverage to allow some control over the public entity’s insurance spending. One coverage where costs can be fixed is workers’ compensation. A guaranteed-cost, first-dollar workers’ compensation program removes the unpredictability of claims and frees up cash flow that would otherwise be allocated to self-insured retention funding.
Benefits of a workers’ compensation program extend beyond guaranteed cost savings and include cost avoidance through robust risk-management services such as loss control, managed care programs, and nurse triage services. Additionally, public entities should seek liability risk-management services from their brokers and carriers. Sought-after capabilities include broad abuse coverage, bullying and other specialty coverages, and training programs for public entity employees.
Broadening of statutes will continue, and the overall hard market is expected to stretch into at least 2021. Retailers should prepare clients for significant rate increases, changes in terms, and the potential need to move coverage from admitted paper to the E&S market. Insureds should proactively take these steps: 1) identify potential victims by reviewing old claims that were time-barred, 2) compile or recreate old insurance policies, and 3) evaluate their overall abuse risk management program to include training, reporting, and documentation. In this challenging marketplace, it is essential for retailers to partner with a wholesaler that has the experience, expertise and market access to develop effective risk-management solutions.
AmWINS Specialty Casualty Solutions (ASCS), an AmWINS Group company, is a full-service managing general agency with focused expertise in delivering workers’ compensation solution for niche markets. The ASCS School Insurance Program offers first-dollar, guaranteed-cost coverage and risk-management services that meets the unique challenges faced by todays’ educational entities. To learn more visit amwins.com/schoolinsurance.
This article was authored by Carol Wells and Cindy Allen, both Vice Presidents and Program Managers at AmWINS Specialty Casualty Solutions.
Legal Disclaimer. Views expressed here do not constitute legal advice. The information contained herein is for general guidance of matter only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. Discussion of insurance policy language is descriptive only. Every policy has different policy language. Coverage afforded under any insurance policy issued is subject to individual policy terms and conditions. Please refer to your policy for the actual language.
(c) 2017 AmWINS Group, Inc.
As the healthcare industry remains on the front lines of battling the COVID-19 pandemic, staying abreast of the changing landscape and how the insurance market is adapting is critical to ensure new exposures are covered and renewals are successfully placed. In this article, our specialists share what they are seeing in the Healthcare and Senior Care markets, tips for risk control and mitigation, and how to get the best results for insureds.
The disruption to business and everyday life caused by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic is resulting in an economic impact for insureds. Much of this disruption is likely not covered by insurance. We have consulted with several AmWINS insurance specialists across the Property, Casualty and Professional Lines sectors and offer a COVID-19 update.
Over the last few years, the legal cannabis industry has seen rapid growth and had a significant impact on the U.S. economy. With states continuing to legalize its use, insurance needs for cannabis-related businesses are becoming a popular topic of discussion. This article examines the evolving cannabis industry by exploring five key issues impacting coverage.
Construction contract negotiations, which determine the kind and amount of insurance required for a construction project, can be time-consuming, complicated and frustrating. Project owners require contractors on a project to name the project owner as an additional insured on the contractor’s casualty insurance program. It's important that both project owners and contractors understand the coverage provided by these additional insured endorsements. This article discusses four common ISO additional insured endorsements related to commercial general liability policies purchased by contractors, including their limitations, conditions and exclusions.
Parametric insurance is an innovative product that functions differently than traditional insurance by covering the impacts of an event and not just losses sustained to an asset. Proceeds of the policy are paid quickly and can be used flexibly to cover any expense associated with the triggering event. Coverages can be designed to capture the impacts of natural perils and other forms of non-damage business interruptions such as future epidemics. Learn how the parametric landscape has and will continue to play a major role in improving coverage and the recovery experience.
The theories of recovery, as well as the ensuing loss provisions, contained in property insurance policies are often complex and, at times, seemingly in conflict. Although a policy may not directly address these theories, their application by courts plays a significant role in the coverage determination process after the claim. It is essential that brokers understand the primary theories of recovery – Efficient Proximate Cause, the Concurrent Causation Doctrine, and the Anti-Concurrent Causation Doctrine – in order to navigate the challenging post-claim process and effectively serve their clients.